卢旺达：标准化信贷框架的经验教训（英）2026

Rwanda Lessons Learned from the Rwanda © 2026 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank1818 H Street NWWashington DC 20433Telephone: 202-473-1000 Background......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5Rollout.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5Lessons Learned .................................................................................................................................................................................................7Conclusions......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusionsexpressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or currency of the data included in this work and does notassume responsibility for any errors, omissions, or discrepancies in the information, or liability with respect to the use of orfailure to use the information, methods, processes, or conclusions set forth. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other Nothing herein shall constitute or be construed or considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunitiesof The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this workmay be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The WorldBank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: pubrights@worldbank.org. Cover photo:The World Bank Governing boardPerforms policy and executive functions for the SCF and provides overall authority and strategic direction for implementation •Ministry of Environment•Ministry of Infrastructure•Rwanda Standards Board•Rwanda Green Fund•Rwanda Energy Group •Development Bank of Rwanda•Ministry of Finance and EconomicPlanning•Private sector federation Technical committeePerforms the technical functions for the SCF and provides technical inputs and recommendations to the GB •Development Bank of Rwanda (BRD)•Private Sector Federation•Rwanda Standards Board•Energy Development Corporation Limited •Ministry of Environment•Ministry of Infrastructure•Rwanda Green Fund•Rwanda Energy Group The SCF provided a model forArticle 6 governance but support The SCF was a useful but time-limited crediting standard Administrator Performs most of the day-to-day administrative functions The SCF has been a useful, flexible carbon creditingstandard for the Ci-Dev ERPA and for EAQIP. Theflexibility of the SCF allowed ER program method-ologies to be designed specifically for the EAQIPresults-based financing programs, in the Rwandan The SCF was consideredaspecific cooperativeapproachwithin theRCMF andwastreated sepa-ratelyfrom Rwanda’sfour-stepprocesstoevalu-atecarbon market projects.Despite the separate Figure 1. SCF governance in Rwanda SCF Registry.Because SCF ERs needed to be re-corded in a registry (that is, delivered) to fulfil ERPApayment requirements, the World Bank initiallyprovided advice to REMA on registry options, Upona request from REMA in May 2024, Ci-Dev begansupporting the further development of Rwanda’snational carbon registry through its funding forthe SCF rollout.23In late 2024, it became clear thatSCF credits would need to be issued within a trans-action registry and there was a recognition that been revised from time to time, based on feedbackfrom implementers and verifiers, subject to Technical Listing, MRV, and Issuance. Once the initial set ofSCF documents was approved and published, ER pro-grams could begin. EDCL requested listing of the firsttwo EAQIP ER programs in August 2023 and REMAsubsequently confirmed the listing of those programsin October 2023. The first ER verification for both ERprograms commenced in March 2024 with the accred-ited third-party auditor AENOR and was completedin December 2024. REMA as the SCF administratorapproved the first SCF ER issuance (6165 SCF ERsfor SHS and 7,418 SCF ERs for ICS) in March 2025. There needed to be a betterunderstanding upfront of functionalrequirements for a registry capable However, REMA does not have the capacity n