2023 年结果共和本国国民调查 Pulse 报

FY 2023Republic of CongoCountry Opinion Survey–Pulse Report ECR Business Intelligence TeamPublic Disclosure Authorized Acknowledgements The Congo Country Opinion Survey is part of the County Opinion SurveyProgram series of the World Bank Group. This report was prepared bythe Business Intelligence (BI) team, led by José De Buerba (SeniorExternal Affairs Officer) and Svetlana Markova (Senior External AffairsOfficer). Yulia Danilina, Jessica Cameron, Nan Lin, and SofyaGubaydullina oversaw design, reporting, and analysis. Noreen Wambuiand Irina Popova provided data support. BI acknowledges the significant contribution from the Congo countryteam. In particular, BI is grateful for the support from Franck SidneyChrysantheme Bitemo (Communications Consultant) who coordinated thesurvey related activities from Brazzaville, Republic of Congo. Contents ObjectivesOverall ContextOverall Attitudes toward the World Bank GroupWorld Bank Group’s Support in Development AreasWorld Bank Group’s Work and Engagement on the GroundCommunications and OutreachSample DemographicsMethodology Objectives This survey was designed to assist the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understandingof how stakeholders in Congo perceive the WBG. The survey explored the following questions: 1.What opinion do key stakeholders have of the WBG when it comes to its effectiveness,relevance, alignment with Congo’s development priorities, and other key indicators? Areopinions improving or declining? 2.What areas of development are perceived to be the most important? Have the prioritieschanged over the past five years?3.How the WBG is perceived as a development partner? Are opinions improving or declining?4.What key topics the WBG communicates around do stakeholders recall? Is there arelationship between message recall and views of the WBG’s work? Overall Context Familiarity with the World Bank Year comparison: Respondents in this year’s CountrySurvey reported significantly higher levels of familiaritywith the World Bank Group compared to FY18: Mean familiarity:FY23 =6.0;FY18 =5.3. Collaboration:Respondents who indicated that theycollaborate with the WBG in FY23 reported significantlyhigher levels of familiarity with the institution’s work: Mean familiarity:Collaborate with WBG =7.3Do not collaborate =4.9 The number of respondents who indicated that theycollaborate/work with the WBG was comparable in theFY23 and FY18 Country Surveys. Please refer to theFY23 vs FY18 data comparisons for those respondentswho closely collaborate with the Bank in the Appendix. Trust in Institutions The most trusted institutions in Congo were the WBGand other donor institutions (overall mean rating forboth = 7.1) . The media, youth organizations, and syndicates werethe least trusted institutions among respondents(overall mean ratings = 4.9, 4.8, and 4.6, respectively). Overall Attitudes towardthe World Bank Group Key Performance Indicators In FY23, respondents gave significantly higher ratings for the WBG’salignmentwith their development priorities, itsrelevance, and itseffectiveness in achieving resultsin Congo compared to FY18. Academia and GovernmentStakeholdersHave More PositivePerceptions of the WBG Comparing ratings of key performance indicatorsbetween stakeholder groups, distinct patterns emergein their perceptions of the WBG and its work in thatrespondents fromacademiaandgovernmentinstitutionstend to hold more favorable views.Conversely, respondents from theprivate sectorconsistently provided lower ratings of the WBG and itswork (they also exhibit the lowest level of familiarity withthe WBG). To what extent do you trust the WBG to do what is right? Scale: 1 To nodegree at all–10 To a very significant degreeThe World Bank Group currently plays a relevant role in development inthe Republic of Congo.Scale: 1: Strongly disagree–10: Strongly agree)The World Bank Group’s work is well aligned with what I consider thedevelopment priorities for the Republic of Congo.Scale: 1: Stronglydisagree–10: Strongly agree)To what extent does the World Bank Group influence the developmentagenda in the Republic of Congo?Scale: 1 To no degree at all–10 To avery significant degreeHow effective has the World Bank Group been in achieving developmentresults in the Republic of Congo?Scale:1: Not effective at all–10: Veryeffective Overall Ratings for Indicator Questions Year comparison: Respondents in this year’s CountrySurvey reported significantly higher aggregated meanratings for the twelve indicator questions compared toFY18: Mean overall ratings:FY23 =7.0;FY18 =6.2. Collaboration:Respondents in FY23 who indicated thatthey collaborate with the WBG had significantly highermean ratings for the twelve indictor questions comparedto respondents who do not collaborate with the WBG: Mean overall ratings:Collaborate with WBG mean =7.3;Do not collaborate mean =6.7. World Bank Group’s Supportin Development Areas Development Prioritiesfor the WBG Health,agricultur