行星滚柱丝杠市场份额

我们 need answer in Chinese. Need use provided text. Need answer question "行星滚柱丝杠市场份额" based on provided texts. Need add citations like 【1】 etc. Avoid repeat same source. Need humanized. Need maybe mention data from refs: 2023 domestic vendors (excluding Taiwan) share ~15% (ref1). 2022 global share forecast: Ewellix 14.0, Rexroth 11.99, 南京工艺 7.5, 博特精工 7.5, CMC 2.0, 优士特 0? Wait ref2 image data: Ewellix 14.0038, 优士特 0.0, 博特精工 7.5, CMC 2.00092, Rexroth 11.99, 南京工艺 7.5. Ref3 text: 2022 global share forecast Rollvis GSA Ewellix Rexroth 南京工艺 博特精工 CMC 优士特 (no numbers). Need answer. Also ref15 mentions reverse planetary roller screw cost, not market share. Need maybe mention "国外巨头主导，中国企业已经迎头赶上" from ref15. Need maybe mention "2023国内厂商（不含台系）行星滚柱丝杠市场份额约为15%" from ref1. Need maybe mention "2022 global share forecast" from ref2/3. Need be careful: ref2 is image with data. Need cite 【2】 . Ref3 maybe same data but no numbers; can cite 【3】 for list of players. Need avoid repeating same source? We can cite ref1 and ref2 and ref15. Need answer humanized.

Need perhaps structure: "关于行星滚柱丝杠市场份额，目前公开数据比较零散，我帮你梳理一下：1) 从全球格局看，2022年预测数据显示Ewellix约14%，Rexroth约12%，南京工艺和博特精工各约7.5%，CMC约2%，优士特约0% 【2】 。主要玩家包括Rollvis、GSA、Ewellix、Rexroth、南京工艺、博特精工、CMC、优士特等 【3】 。2) 从国内厂商份额看，2023年国内厂商（不含台系）行星滚柱丝杠市场份额约为15% 【1】 。3) 从应用端看，反向行星滚柱丝杠在人形机器人成本中占比较高，目前国外巨头主导，但中国企业已经迎头赶上 【15】 。所以整体来看，行星滚柱丝杠市场仍由外资主导，但国产替代正在加速。"

Need ensure "优士特 0.0" maybe weird. Could say "优士特在预测中份额接近0" or "数据为0.0". Need maybe mention "市场份额单位百万元人民币" from ref1? Actually ref1 says "2023年国内厂商（不含台系）行星滚柱丝杠市场份额约为15%（单位：百万元人民币）" Wait "市场份额约为15%（单位：百万元人民币）" odd. Maybe means market size? Let's parse: "2023年国内厂商（不含台系）行星滚柱丝杠市场份额约为15%（单位：百万元人民币）" Could be "国内厂商市场份额约为15%" and unit is million RMB? Hmm. Need answer "约15%" not unit.

Need maybe mention "2022 global share forecast" from ref2. Need perhaps "Ewellix 14.0038" maybe "约14.0%". "Rexroth 11.99" "约12.0%". "南京工艺 7.5", "博特精工 7.5", "CMC 2.00092" "约2.0%". "优士特 0.0" maybe "0%". Need maybe "RollvisGSAEwellixRexroth南京工艺博特精工CMC优士特" from ref3. Need cite.

Need maybe "根据参考资料[2]的图片，2022年行星滚柱丝杠全球市场份额（预测）中，Ewellix约14.0%，Rexroth约12.0%，南京工艺和博特精工各约7.5%，CMC约2.0%，优士特为0.0%。" Good.

Need maybe "参考资料[3]也列出了这些主要厂商，包括Rollvis、GSA、Ewellix、Rexroth、南京工艺、博特精工、CMC、优士特 【3】 。" Good.

Need maybe "参考资料[15]提到反向行星滚柱丝杠目前国外巨头主导，但中国企业已经迎头赶上 【15】 。" Good.

Need maybe "参考资料[1]显示2023年国内厂商（不含台系）份额约15% 【1】 。" Good.

Need answer "行星滚柱丝杠市场份额" maybe "目前没有统一最新数据，但综合来看..." Need humanized.

Need ensure no repeated source? We cite ref1, ref2, ref3, ref15. That's fine.

Need maybe "从全球市场看，外资品牌（Ewellix、Rexroth等）占据主导；国内厂商份额在2023年约15%，说明国产化率还不高，但正在提升。" Good.

Need maybe "注意：这些数据来自不同年份和统计口径，不能直接加总或严格对比，仅供参考。" Good.

Need final with clear format.