山东法院服务保障中国（山东）自由贸易试验区建设白皮书（2019-2024）

White Paper of the Shandong Courts on Serving and Guaranteeingthe Construction of China (Shandong) Pilot Free Trade Zone （2019-2024） 山东省高级人民法院 前 言 目 录 前言 第一部分山东自贸试验区建设基本情况 一、济南片区建设情况…………………………………………………………………3二、青岛片区建设情况…………………………………………………………………4三、烟台片区建设情况…………………………………………………………………5 第二部分司法服务保障山东自贸试验区建设基本情况 一、自贸区案件基本情况………………………………………………………………9 （一）自贸区案件概况………………………………………………………………9（二）自贸区案件特点………………………………………………………………10 二、服务保障自贸区建设的主要措施…………………………………………………11 （一）坚持制度先行，构建服务保障工作体系……………………………………12（二）优化审判布局，健全专业化审判机制………………………………………12（三）实施精品战略，提升审判质量和效率………………………………………13（四）强化务实协作，形成服务保障合力…………………………………………14（五）完善多元解纷，实现纠纷解决便利化………………………………………14（六）加大调研宣传，扩大自贸区审判影响力……………………………………16（七）突出涉外特色，提升自贸区审判国际公信力………………………………16（八）延伸司法服务，提升服务保障工作实效……………………………………17 第三部分完善山东自贸试验区建设的司法建议 一、加快完善自贸区诚信机制建设……………………………………………………21二、建立常态化府院沟通机制…………………………………………………………21三、积极推进多式联运“一单制”试点………………………………………………22四、加强涉外法治人才培养……………………………………………………………22 第四部分涉山东自贸试验区典型案例 案例一：青岛某国际物流公司诉香港某公司、臧某买卖合同纠纷案………………25案例二：上海某航运经纪公司诉深圳某进出口公司、青岛某物流公司海上货物运输合同纠纷案…………………………………………………………………27案例三：申请人瑞士某公司与被申请人青岛某公司申请承认与执行外国仲裁裁决案…………………………………………………………………………………29案例四：香港某控股公司诉山东某科技公司委托合同纠纷案………………………31案例五：潍坊某木业公司诉烟台某建设公司、烟台某门窗公司票据追索权纠纷案…………………………………………………………………………………33案例六：青岛某食品公司诉法国某奶制品合作社名誉权纠纷案……………………35案例七：济南某置业公司诉郑州某商贸公司等追收未缴出资纠纷案………………37案例八：青岛某国际贸易公司诉青岛某冷链物流公司、青岛某运营管理公司港口货物仓储合同纠纷案…………………………………………………………39案例九：中国银行烟台某支行诉王某甲、王某乙、姜某某金融借款合同纠纷案……41案例十：日本某株式会社诉山东某钢业公司、江苏某金属制品公司、李某某买卖合同纠纷案……………………………………………………………………43 结束语 Contents Preface Part I: Overview of the Construction of SDPFTZ 1. Overview of the Construction of Jinan Area…………………………………………………………522. Overview of the Construction of Qingdao Area………………………………………………………533. Overview of the Construction of Yantai Area…………………………………………………………54 Part II: Overview of the Judicial Guarantee for the Construction of SDPFTZ 1. Basic Information of Cases Related to SDPFTZ………………………………………………………591.1 Overview of Cases Related to SDPFTZ……………………………………………………………591.2 Characteristics of Cases Involving SDPFTZ………………………………………………………592. Primary Measures for Ensuring the Construction of SDPFTZ…………………………………………612.1 Uphold the Principle of Putting Systems First by Developing a Service and Guarantee System……………………………………………………………………………………………………612.2 Optimize the Process of Trial Arrangement and Enhance the Professional Trial Mechanism……622.3 Implement a High-quality Strategy to Improve the Quality and Efficiency of Trials……………632.4 Strengthen Practical Cooperation and Form a Joint Force for Service and Guarantee……………652.5 Improve Diversified Dispute Resolution and Facilitate Dispute Resolution……………………662.6 Strengthen Research and Publicity to Expand the Influence of Trials in SDPFTZ………………682.7 Highlight International Characteristics and Enhance the International Credibility of Trials Relatedto SDPFTZ………………………………………………………………………………………692.8 Extend Judicial Services and Improve the Effectiveness of Service and Guarantee……………71 Part III: Judicial Suggestions for Improving the Construction of SDPFTZ 1. Improve the Integrity Mechanism in the Construction of SDPFTZ…………………………………752. Establish a Normalized Communication Mechanism between the Government and Courts………763. Advocate for the Implementation of the Pilot Model of Multimodal Transport“One-bill”CoverageMechanism……………………………………………………………………………………………764. Strengthen the Training of Foreign-related Legal Talents…………………………………………77 Part IV: Typical Cases Related to SDPFTZ Case 1: Dispute Over a Sales Contract: a Qingdao International Logistics Company v. a Hong KongCompany and ZANG X………………………………………………………………………81Case 2:Dispute Over a Contract of Carriage of Goods by Sea: a Shanghai Shipping BrokerageCompany v. a Shenzhen Import and Export Company and a Qingdao Logistics Company…84Case 3: Application for Recognition and Enforcement of a Foreign Arbitral Award: a Swiss Company v.a Qingdao Company…………………………………………………………………………87Case 4: Dispute Over a Commission Contract: a Hong Kong Holding Company v. a Shandong TechnologyCompany………………………………………………………………………………………89Case 5: Dispute Over Bill Recourse: a Weifang Wood Company v. a Yantai Construction Company anda Yantai Door and Window Company…………………………………………………………92Case 6: Dispute over Infringement of Right of Reputation: a Qingdao Food Company v. a French DairyCooperative……………………………………………………………………………………94Case 7: Dispute over the Collection of Unpaid Capital Contributions: a Jinan Real Estate Company v. aZhengzhou Trading Company, et al……………………………………………………………96Case 8: Dispute over a Port Cargo Warehousing Contract: a Qingdao International Trading Company v.a Qingdao Cold Chain Logistics Company and a Qingdao Operation Management Company…………………………………………………………………………………………………99Case 9: Dispute over a Home Loan Agreement: a Sub-branch of Bank of China in Yantai v. WANG X,WANG Y, and JIANG Z……………………………………………………………………102Case 10: Dispute over a Port Cargo Warehousing Contract: a Japanese Company v. a Shandong SteelCompany, a Jiangsu Metal Products Company, and LI X………………