2024年全球城市实力指数报告

What is the GPCI? 6 of the ranking process and results, two third-party peer reviewers validate the contents andprovide suggestions for improvement. Given the global competition betweencities, the Global Power City Index(GPCI) evaluates and ranks the major cities ofthe world according to their “magnetism,” ortheir comprehensive power to attract people,capital, and enterprises from around the world.It does so through measuring 6 functions—Economy, Research and Development, CulturalInteraction,Livability,Environment,andAccessibility—providing a multidimensionalranking. The GPCI is able to grasp the strengths,weaknesses, and challenges of global citiesin a continuously changing world not onlythrough a ranking, but also through analyzingthat ranking’s specific components. It is hopedthat in addition to this year’s results, thehistorical data since 2008 will also continue tobe of use to various stakeholders for planningurban policy and corporate strategy. 2008 GPCI2008 Originally formulated with input from thelate Sir Peter Hall, an authority in the urbanresearch field, and published annually since2008, this ranking is created under the directionof the Executive Committee, comprised ofvarious experts in different fields, while theWorking Committee oversees concrete dataanalysis. In order to ensure the impartiality GlobalPower City Index, GPCIGPCI Executive Committee Hiroo Ichikawa Professor Emeritus, Meiji UniversityExecutive Director, The Mori Memorial Foundation Professor Emeritus, Keio UniversityChairman, Institute for Urban Strategies,The Mori Memorial Foundation Peter Nijkamp Allen J. ScottDistinguished Research Professor,University of California,Los AngelesJ Research coordinator,Open University of the Netherlands,Heerlen, and Professor,AC Cuza University of Iasi Saskia SassenRobert S. Lynd Professor,Columbia University Original Principal AdvisorSir Peter Hall1932-2014Professor,University College London1932-2014 Michael BattyCBEBartlett Professor, andChairman,CASA,University College London Heng Chye KiangProvosts Chair Professor,National University of Singapore CASA Peer Reviewers Working Committee Lise Bourdeau- LepageFull-Professor,University Lyon, France©Guillaume Voiseau, photographe Andrés Rodríguez-PosePrincesa de Asturias Professor,London School of Economics Principal : Hiroo IchikawaMember : Institute for Urban Strategies,The Mori Memorial Foundation:: Methodology combined to calculate a city’s function-specificrankings, which are then totalled to determineits comprehensive ranking.The highest possibletotal score equals 2,600 points. GPCI626702 , 600 The GPCI evaluates its target cities in6 urban functions and each of thesefunctions comprises multiple indicator groups(total: 26 groups), which in turn consist ofseveral indicators. A total of 70 indicatorsare used in the GPCI.The average scores foreach indicator within an indicator group are 1London 2New York New York maintained its #2 position but saw adrop in its overall score compared to last year,widening the gap with London. It continued tosecure the #1 spot in both the Economy andR&D functions, demonstrating its strengths.Additionally, in the Accessibility function, NewYork improved its ranking, with factors likeEaseof Mobility by Public Transportationbeing highlyrated. However, in the Livability and Environmentfunctions, it remained in the 30s, indicating roomfor improvement. London, ranked #1, maintained its topposition with an increased overall score.It secured the #1 spot in both the CulturalInteraction and Accessibility functions,whichare considered its strengths.Additionally, in the Livability function,London improved its score in areas suchas “Working Environment,” climbing to #6.If progress continues in the Environmentfunction, a further increase in its overallscore can be expected. 130 116 Criteria for Selecting Cities Cities found in the top 20 of existing influential city rankingsMajor cities of countries found in the top 20 of existing influentialinternational competitiveness rankingsCities which do not meet the above criteria but were deemedappropriate for inclusion by the GPCI Executive Committee1.2.3. 3Tokyo Tokyo, ranked #3, significantly increased itsscore this year, narrowing the gap with NewYork. However, it is closely trailed by Parisin 4th place, making the competition tight.Notably, Tokyo’s evaluations improved infour functions: R&D, Cultural Interaction,Livability, and Accessibility, boosting itsoverall score. On the other hand, a challengeremains in the Economic function, where itsscore has shown a relative decline. 34 However, some cities match one or more of the above criteria but arenot evaluated in the GPCI as necessary data are not available. 1.2.3.2020 Comprehensive Ranking Paris saw an increase in its score in the Cultural Interaction function,driven by Paris 2024 Olympics Games. As the impact of global warmingbecomes increasingly severe, making urban sustainability effor