经合组织发展合作同行评审：卢森堡2025

OECD DevelopmentCo‑operation Peer Reviews:Luxembourg2025 This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed andarguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Member countries of the OECD. This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty overany territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Kosovo*: This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with United Nations Security CouncilResolution 1244/99 and the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on Kosovo’s declaration ofindependence. OECD (2025),OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews: Luxembourg 2025, OECD Development Co-operation PeerReviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3713cf73-en. ISBN 978-92-64-89586-7 (print)ISBN 978-92-64-37976-3 (PDF)ISBN 978-92-64-91612-8 (HTML) OECD Development Co-operation Peer ReviewsISSN 2309-7124 (print)ISSN 2309-7132 (online) Photo credits:Elements of the cover design adapted from © Sylverarts/Shutterstock.com. Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/support/corrigenda.html.© OECD 2025 Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. By using this work, you accept to be bound by the terms of this licence(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Attribution– you must cite the work.Translations– you must cite the original work, identify changes to the original and add the following text:In the event of any discrepancy between the original work and thetranslation, only the text of original work should be considered valid.Adaptations– you must cite the original work and add the following text:This is an adaptation of an original work by the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed inthis adaptation should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its Member countries.Third-party material– the licence does not apply to third-party material in the work. If using such material, you are responsible for obtaining permission from the third party and forany claims of infringement.You must not use the OECD logo, visual identity or cover image without express permission or suggest the OECD endorses your use of the work.Any dispute arising under this licence shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) Arbitration Rules 2012. The seat of arbitration shallbe Paris (France). The number of arbitrators shall be one. Foreword The OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts reviews of the development co-operationefforts of DAC members every five to six years. DAC peer reviews seek to improve the quality andeffectiveness of development co-operation policies, programmesand systems, and to promote gooddevelopment partnerships for greater impact on poverty reduction and sustainable development indeveloping countries. As set out in themethodologyupdated regularly and agreed to by the DAC, DAC peer reviews focus on aselect number of areas critical to the quality of a member’s development co-operation. These focus areasare decided in agreement with the member under review, drawing on a self-assessment submitted by themember as well as on inputs from key partners. Based on these, staff from the Secretariat and two DACmembers designated as peer reviewers visit the member’s capital to interview public officials andparliamentarians, as well asrepresentatives of civil society, non-government organisations, the privatesector and relevant experts. This is followed by visits to up to two developing partner countries or territories,where the review team meets with the reviewed member’s governmentrepresentatives as well as seniorofficials and representatives of the partner country’s administration, parliamentarians, civil society, theprivate sector and other development partners. The findings of these consultations and accompanyingrecommendations are then discussed during a formal meeting of the DAC prior to finalisation of the report.During the process, the OECD Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD) provides analytical support. To support learning between DAC members, the report highlights valuable practices from Luxembourg,from which other DAC members and development actors can draw inspiration and learning. These aredocumented in further detail on theDevelopment Co-operation TIPs ∙ Tools Insights Practices peerlearning platform, that offers insights into making policies, systems and partnerships more effective.Thepeer review report iscomplemented by Luxembourg’sdevelopment co-operation profilewhichincludesfactual information on its policies, development financing, institutional arrangements, and managementsystems. The