2026年开源格局报告：生产环境中开源软件运行实践

OpenSourceLandscape ReportHow teams actually run open source in production in 2026 – what broke, what changed, and what finally works.2 0 2 6 Table ofContents what now? Dear Colleagues, What emerged is a picture of an industry maturing fast.Some trends have solidified since last year. Others haveshifted in ways that even surprised us. Together, they tell thestory of teams adapting, recalibrating, and becoming moreintentional about how they run open source at scale.Open-Source Supply Chain SecurityA closer examination of how teams are managingdependencies, mitigating upstream risk, and adapting theirsupply chain strategies as threats continue to evolve.Taken together, these findings reflect an ecosystem that’s Open source now sits at the core of enterprise operations –and has become foundational to how systems run inproduction. This report captures how organizations are actually runningopen-source software (OSS) in production in 2026. Based onTuxCare’s annual industry survey, it reflects the real-worldexperiences of engineers, security teams, and platformowners responsible for keeping critical systems stable,secure, and compliant.The past year forced hard decisions. High-profile securityIn this report, you’ll find insights across five key areas:Open-Source Technologies in UseA look at the operating systems, platforms, and open-sourcecomponents organizations are relying on today – in additionto analysis on what those choices reveal about stability, becoming more pragmatic, more disciplined, and moreaware of the true cost (and value) of open source inproduction.We’re deeply grateful to everyone who participated in this flexibility, and long-term planning.Open-Source Security Incidentsyear’s survey. Your perspectives don’t just inform this report;they help shape a broader conversation about how opensource can remain secure, reliable, and sustainable as itcontinues to power critical systems worldwide. We invite you to dig into the data, challenge your failures exposed weak assumptions. End-of-life timelinesstopped being easily ignorable. Patching, dependency trust,and lifecycle accountability became unavoidable parts ofeveryday operations. And yet, teams kept shipping: adaptingprocesses, tightening controls, and finding ways to moveforward without breaking what already works.This year’s survey was designed with one goal in mind: to cutHow recent, high-impact incidents have changed the wayteams think about risk, trust, testing, and response – andwhere gaps still remain.Linux Patch and Vulnerability Management assumptions, and use these insights as a benchmark for yourown strategies. The open-source landscape will keepchanging – but informed teams will always be better positioned to navigate what comes next.Sincerely, An inside view of how organizations are handling patching inreal environments, including what’s working, what’s slowing through assumptions and capture reality.We focused less on what should be happening in theory, andteams down, and how priorities are shifting. OSS Lifecycle ManagementHow enterprises are approaching end-of-life software,Your friends at choose open-source technologies, how they respond whenthings break, and how they manage risk across increasinglycomplex stacks.extended usage, and long-term maintenance in a worldwhere upgrades aren’t always immediate – or even possible. The typical open-sourcestack is getting deeper —and accumulating inherited dependencyrisk along the way. Open-SourceTechnologies in Use How is Open Source showing upinside of organizations today? of enterprise open source users (the highest reported adoption) say they work with open-source programming languages & runtimes, significantly ahead of Linux OS usage (45.19%).This difference likely reflects that Linux is frequently consumed indirectly through cloud services, managed platforms, containers, or PaaS, making it less visible in day-to-day development work andtherefore less likely to be reported. frequently than application-layer open-source componentsOnly 41.00% of respondents say they work with these tools, suggestinglower direct engagement and/or reduced visibility relative to the relying on managed Linux without thinking ofit as “Linux usage.” software stacks they support. Linux is widespread – but most serverfleets are modest in size. The largest segment is 21–100 systems(28.70%), followed by <10 systems(19.44%), which suggests that: workloads rather than uniformly across all systems. Backend services Infrastructure platformsData and integration layersDevelopment or internal tooling environments Important systems that don’t get enterprise-grade attention. Over half of enterprise Linux users run Ubuntu. Followed closely byDebian,which is run by 44.44% of Linux users surveyed. The remainder of the footprint isfragmented across both legacy andenterprise distributions: CentOS, likely with third-party extended security support(since all versions of stable CentOS have reached en