人工智能国家政策框架

ArtificialIntelligence ANationalPolicy Framework for Artificial Intelligence AI services and platforms must take measures to protect children, while empoweringparents to control their children’s digital environment and upbringing. I . P r o t e c t i n g C h i l d r e n a n d E m p o w e r i n gP a r e n t s •Congress should build on actions to date by the Trump Administration to protectchildren, including the historic signing of the Take It Down Act, a key initiative ofFirst Lady Melania Trump to protect children and adult victims from deepfakeabuse. •Congress should empower parents and guardians with robust tools to manage theirchildren’s privacy settings, screen time, content exposure, and account controls.•Congress should establish commercially reasonable, privacy protective, age-assurance requirements (such as parental attestation) for AI platforms and serviceslikely to be accessed by minors.•Congress should require AI platforms and services likely to be accessed by minorsto implement features that reduce the risks of sexual exploitation and self-harm tominors.•Congress should affirm that existing child privacy protections apply to AI systems,including limits on data collection for model training and targeted advertising.•Congress should avoid setting ambiguous standards about permissible content, oropen-ended liability, that could give rise to excessive litigation.•Congress should ensure that it does not preempt states from enforcing their owngenerally applicable laws protecting children, such as prohibitions on child sexualabuse material, even where such material is generated by AI. AI development, including data infrastructure buildout, should strengthen Americancommunitiesand small businesses through economic growth and energydominance, while ensuring communities are protected from harmful impacts. I I . S a f e g u a r d i n g a n d S t r e n g t h e n i n gA m e r i c a n C o m m u n i t i e s •In accordance with theRatepayer Protection Pledge, Congress should ensure thatresidential ratepayers do not experience increased electricity costs as a result ofnew AI data center construction and operation. •Atthe same time,Congress should streamline federal permitting for AIinfrastructure construction and operation so AI developers can develop or procureon-site and behind-the-meter power generation to accelerate AI infrastructurebuildout and enhance grid reliability.•Congress should augment existing law enforcement efforts to combat AI-enabledimpersonation scams and fraud that target vulnerable populations such as seniors.•Congress should ensure that the appropriate agencies within the national securityenterprise possess sufficient technical capacity to understand frontier AI modelcapabilities and any associated national security considerations and establish plansto mitigate potential concerns, including through consultation with frontier AImodel developers.•Congress should provide AI resources to small businesses, such as grants, taxincentives, and technical assistance programs, to support wider deployment of AItools across American industry. Americancreators,publishers,and innovators should be protected from AI-generated outputs that infringe their protected content, without undermining lawfulinnovation and free expression. I I I . R e s p e c t i n g I n t e l l e c t u a l P r o p e r t y R i g h t sa n d S u p p o r t i n g C r e a t o r s •Although the Administration believes that training of AI models on copyrightedmaterial does not violate copyright laws, it acknowledges arguments to the contraryexist and therefore supports allowing the Courts to resolve this issue. Similarly,Congress should not take any actions that would impact the judiciary’s resolution ofwhether training on copyrighted material constitutes fair use. •Congress should consider enabling licensing frameworks or collective rightssystemsfor rights holders to collectively negotiate compensation from AIproviders, without incurring antitrust liability. Any such legislation, however, shouldnot address when or whether such licensing is required. •Congress should consider establishing a federal framework protecting individualsfrom the unauthorized distribution or commercial use of AI-generated digitalreplicas of their voice, likeness, or other identifiable attributes, while providing clearexceptions for parody, satire, news reporting, and other expressive works protectedby the First Amendment. Congress should prevent persons from abusing such aframework to stifle free speech online. •Congress should continue to carefully monitor the development of copyrightprecedents and enforcement in the courts and evaluate whether, due to novel AIconsiderations, additional action beyond that proposed here is needed to fillpotential gaps or provide additional protections for content creators. The federal government must defend free speech and First Amendment protections,while preventing AI systems from being used to silence or censor