您的浏览器禁用了JavaScript(一种计算机语言,用以实现您与网页的交互),请解除该禁用,或者联系我们。[ZYen]:全球绿色金融指数13-补充“H2 Go-氢经济,白日梦还是灵丹妙药?” - 发现报告

全球绿色金融指数13-补充“H2 Go-氢经济,白日梦还是灵丹妙药?”

金融2024-04-23ZYenf***
AI智能总结
查看更多
全球绿色金融指数13-补充“H2 Go-氢经济,白日梦还是灵丹妙药?”

April 2024 Sustainable Futures Beginning in March 2018, as part of its Long Finance initiative, Z/Yen published the first five editions ofthe Global Green Finance Index with the generous support of the MAVA Foundation, and morerecently with support from Abu Dhabi Global Market. Z/Yen continues this work and is pleased topresent the thirteenth edition of the Global Green Finance Index (GGFI 13). Z/Yenhelps organisations make better choices-ourclientsconsider us a commercial think-tank thatspots, solves, and acts. Our name combines Zen and Yen-‘a philosophical desire to succeed’-in aratio, recognising that all decisions are trade-offs. One of Z/Yen’s specialisms is the development andpublication of research combining factor analysis and professional assessments. Long Financeis a Z/Yen initiative designed to address the question“When would we know ourfinancial system is working?”This question underlies Long Finance’s goal to improve society’sunderstanding and use of finance over the long-term. In contrast to the short-termism that definestoday’s economic views the Long Finance time-frame is roughly 100 years. The authors of this report, Mike Wardle,Simon Mills, and Professor MichaelMainelli, would like to thank Bikash Kharel,Sasha Davis, Charlotte Dawber-Ashley andthe rest of the Z/Yen team for theircontributions with research, modelling,and ideas. Contents Summary Overview This is the thirteenth edition of the Global Green Finance Index (GGFI 13). The GGFI is a factorassessment index, based on a range of instrumental factors-quantitative measures-and a worldwidesurvey of finance professionals’assessments on the quality and depth of green finance offerings infinancial centres. GGFI 13 features 96 financial centres, with Lugano and Kaunas listed for the first time. There appears to be strong confidence in the development of green finance in financial centres, withevery centre’s rating in the index moving up in this edition, and the average rating up 4.21% comparedwith GGFI 12. The centres which perform well in the GGFI continue to be places that are committed to environmentaldevelopment across the economy as well as directly in finance, and in building their skills for greenfinance for the future. Centres such as London, Geneva, Zurich, and New York have a commitment toproviding sustainable improvement and continuing to build their green infrastructure. Among those responding to the GGFI survey, Energy Efficient Investment, Disinvestment From FossilFuels, and Green Insurance are rated as the areas of green finance with most impact. Risk ManagementFrameworks, International Initiatives, and Renewables are listed by respondents as the major drivers ofgreen finance. On international initiatives, some progress was made at COP 28 in terms of commitments to the LossAnd Damage Fund and new commitments to the Green Climate Fund. However, the New CollectiveQualitative Goal, which will set the future requirements for adaptation finance, will be taken forwardat COP 29 later in 2024. In the supplement to this edition of the GGFI, we review the current and potential future of thehydrogen economy as an element of the transition to sustainable fuels, and in particular its use inindustry and transport. Respondents to the GGFI survey predict that hydrogen is most likely to replacefossil fuels in steel production and the chemical industries. Index Results •London retained its first position in the index, while Geneva and Zurich overtook New York to takesecond and third places.•Montreal entered the top 10 in this edition of the index, replacing Copenhagen.•Western European centres take five of the top 10 places, with US centres taking three. Singapore isthe only Asia/Pacific centre in this leading group.•The marginsseparatingcentres at the top of the index continue to narrow in GGFI 13. Among thetop 10 centres the spread of ratings is only 13 points out of 1,000, compared to 20 points in GGFI 12.•Only nine centres fell 10 or more places in the rankings, and four rose 10 or more places. Western EuropeFive Western European centres feature in the top 10 in GGFI 13 and a further six centres feature in •the top 20.•Frankfurt, Malta, and Monaco gained seven or more rank places. North America •New York dropped to fourth place overall, with Washington DC, Los Angeles, and Montreal also inthe world top 10.•All centres in the region maintained or improved their ranking other than New York. Toronto,Vancouver, and Philadelphia gained six or more rank places. Asia/Pacific •Singapore rose four rank places to take fifth position overall and leads the region, ahead of Seoul,Sydney, and Shenzhen.•Almost all centres in the region fell in the rankings, with only Singapore, Guangzhou, Manila, andBangkok improving.•The average increase in the ratings in Asia/Pacific was 3.39%, a full percentage point lower than theglobal average increase. Middle East & AfricaDubai led in the region and rose four rank places to 29th position. Abu