您的浏览器禁用了JavaScript(一种计算机语言,用以实现您与网页的交互),请解除该禁用,或者联系我们。[ITIF]:跨大西洋次国家创新竞争力指数(英) - 发现报告
当前位置:首页/行业研究/报告详情/

跨大西洋次国家创新竞争力指数(英)

文化传媒2022-11-01ITIF孙***
跨大西洋次国家创新竞争力指数(英)

itif.org The Transatlantic Subnational Innovation Competitiveness Index VIKTOR LÁZÁR, IAN CLAY, STEPHEN EZELL, SHELBY LAUTER, AXEL PLÜNNECKE, STEFANO DA EMPOLI, LORENZO PRINCIPALI, MICHELE MASULLI, AND AARON WUDRICK | NOVEMBER 2022 Innovation ecosystems are increasingly complex and diverse, but there are common markers of core strength. In this report, the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, the German Economic Institute, the Institute for Competitiveness, and the Macdonald-Laurier Institute benchmark 96 states and provinces across Germany, Italy, the United States, and Canada. KEY TAKEAWAYS  Governments at all levels are introducing strategies to stimulate national and regional innovation capacity to improve their competitive positions in the race for leadership in the technology- and innovation-driven global economy.  Based on 13 indicators of strength in knowledge, globalization, and innovation capacity, the five top-ranked states are Massachusetts, California, Baden-Württemberg, Berlin, and Washington. The bottom five are Apulia, West Virginia, Sicily, Calabria, and Mississippi.  German states generally perform much better than those of the United States, Canada, and Italy; however, three of the top five are in the United States.  On knowledge economy indicators, America outperforms peers in higher-education attainment, and Canada attracts the most skilled immigrant workers, while Germany exhibits strength in scientific, technical, and professional employment.  In the globalization category, Canada, followed by the United States, leads in inward foreign direct investment (FDI), while Germany and Italy produce greater levels of high-tech exports relative to regional gross domestic product (GDP).  In measurements of innovation capacity, Germany and the United States have clear leadership in research and development (R&D) intensity and venture capital (VC), while Italy performs well in R&D personnel and business creation.  Governments should consider these unique strengths, weaknesses, challenges, and opportunities to craft region-specific policies to bolster innovation competitiveness. ITIF | MLI | I-COM | IW | NOVEMBER 2022 PAGE 2 CONTENTS Key Takeaways ................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 The Transatlantic Subnational Innovation Competitiveness Index ............................................ 5 Overall Score .................................................................................................................. 6 Knowledge Economy ......................................................................................................... 13 Highly Educated Population ........................................................................................... 15 Skilled Immigration ....................................................................................................... 16 Professional, Technical, and Scientific Employment ......................................................... 18 Manufacturing Labor Productivity ................................................................................... 19 Globalization .................................................................................................................... 22 High-Tech Exports ......................................................................................................... 23 Inward FDI ................................................................................................................... 25 Innovation Capacity .......................................................................................................... 26 Broadband Adoption ...................................................................................................... 28 R&D Intensity ............................................................................................................... 30 R&D Personnel ............................................................................................................. 31 Patent Applications ....................................................................................................... 32 Business Creation ......................................................................................................... 34 Carbon Efficiency .......................................................................................................... 35 Venture Capital ............................................................................................................. 37 Policy Recommendations .....................................................................................