引领潮流：全美最大公立大学系统对人工智能的探索

Key Findings from 94,060 CSU Student, Faculty and Staff Voices in the MostComprehensive AI Survey in Higher Education CONTENTS A Message From the Chancellor3Key Findings4Who Responded7AI Awareness and Adoption Across the CSU8The AI Tool Landscape10AI Through the Eyes of Students, Faculty and Staff13AI in the Classroom16Trust, Ethics and Responsibility19Training, Equity and Access22The Road Ahead25Appendix A: About the Study27Acknowledgments30 A MESSAGE FROMTHE CHANCELLOR Dear CSU Community, In February 2025, the California State University took bold action to shape the future of higher education innovationwith the launch of our AI-Empowered University initiative. We acted with urgency, to address inequities emerging acrossthe CSU’s 22-university system regarding uneven access to AI-enabled tools. Instead of continuing with a fragmentedapproach, we leveraged the power of the CSU system to ensure equitable access to state-of-the-art AI tools and As a critical component of this work and to help ensure its sustained success, in fall 2025, we conducted the mostexpansive survey to date on the use of artificial intelligence in higher education – with more than 94,000 respondents,representing students, faculty and staff across our 22 universities. By listening closely to the experiences and The findings presented here will help inform ongoing planning and decision-making, including efforts to supportour faculty and staff in their teaching and professional development, strengthen institutional capacity, and preparegraduates with the knowledge and skills required to thrive in an evolving economy. As you read the report, I invite you I extend my appreciation to all those who participated in this effort and offer my sincere gratitude to the team at SanDiego State University for designing and conducting this survey on behalf of the CSU system. This important work willensure that the CSU’s path forward is guided by broad engagement, careful reflection, and a shared commitment to Warmly, Mildred García, Ed.D.Chancellor In fall 2025, the California State University made history by conducting the largest and mostcomprehensive study of AI perceptions and usage ever undertaken in higher education. The survey wasdistributed to all students, faculty and staff across 22 CSU universities* and the Chancellor’s Office.The findings below reflect the perspectives of 94,060 respondents: students, faculty and staff across BY THE NUMBERS 94,060 Fifty-Five Percent of Faculty Are LeveragingAI in the Classroom, and 69% Are GuidingStudents on How to Use It Ninety-Five Percent of Respondents Have UsedAI, and Most Use It Regularly Ninety-five percent of respondents have used at leastone AI tool. More than half of students, roughly six in 10faculty and nearly two-thirds of staff report regular use.Majorities of all three groups also use AI in their personal More than half of faculty respondents use AI to developcourse materials, and 69% provide students withspecific guidance on how to use AI effectively andresponsibly. More than two-thirds include an explicitAI statement in their syllabi. Thirty-nine percent of 2 ChatGPT Is the Most Used AI ToolAcross the CSU 5 Among survey respondents, ChatGPT is used by 84%of students, 87% of faculty and 89% of staff. The typicalrespondent uses three AI tools, but ChatGPT is theonly one adopted by strong majorities across all threegroups. Among those who use it, about three in 10students and faculty use it daily or more, and nearly four Faculty Are the Only Group Where a MajorityReport Both a Positive Impact and NewChallenges From AI Fifty-six percent of faculty respondents report thatAI has positively affected their teaching and researchand 52% report a negative effect. No other group inthe survey divides this way. Staff lean strongly positiveand students lean positive as well. Faculty alone carrythe full complexity of AI’s promise and disruption 3 Eight in 10 Students Say They Would Not SubmitAI-Generated Work as Their Own About 80% of student respondents are not comfortablesubmitting AI-generated work as their own. This patternholds consistently across demographic groups and AI Adoption Is Virtually Identical Across Racial,Ethnic and First-Generation Lines Regular AI use varies by no more than five percentagepoints across racial and ethnic groups, andfirst-generation and non-first-generation studentsreport nearly identical rates. AI adoption at the CSUdoes not track closely with demographic lines. Adoption 9 Nearly Everyone Agrees:AI Output Must Be VerifiedNinety-seven percent of faculty respondents, 94% of Strong Majorities Believe AI EnhancesCreativity, Even as They Worry About ItsLong-Term Impact staff respondents and 88% of student respondents sayit is necessary to verify the accuracy of AI-generatedcontent. This near-universal agreement holds across job About 78% of staff respondents, 66% of facultyrespondents and 60% of student respondentsagree that AI technology can