风河Linux市场需求

©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries2Table of Content Project Overview:Objectives, Methodology,and Next Steps QUANTITATIVE WEB-BASED SURVEY•N=475 qualified completes•North America (United States, Canada, 53%),Western Europe (France, Germany, United Kingdom,26%), APJ (China, Japan, South Korea, 21%)•Field dates: 8/22/2024-9/6/2024SURVEY RESPONDENTS•IT decision makers with influence over the purchaseprocess for data center compute solutions includingserver operating systems.•Enterprise (2,000+ employees) organizationscurrently using Linux•Complete demographics included at end ofpresentation.Survey Details ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries4Research Objectives•Overview of the current Linuxenvironment•Buying criteria and vendorconsideration that are top-of-mindfor Linux users.Next Steps•Webinar: Kick-off/Content call scheduled for October17th.•Research Insights Paper & Executive Summary:Kick-off/content call scheduled for October 11th.•Will provide next steps for each asset in follow upemail. Current Linux Environment ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries6Sample Included50:50 SplitBetween Linux andNon-Linux UsersWe learned what is holdingorganizations back fromusing Linux and what shareof non-users are planningto adopt Linux in the future.Once these questions wereanswered, non-Linux userswere terminated. ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries7Three KeyFactorsPreventingLinux AdoptionAddressing these concerns(i.e., compatibility issues,security concerns, lack ofvendor support, etc.) canhelp win market share. Most Laggards WillAdopt LinuxEventually83% of non-Linux usersindicated it is“somewhat/very likely” thatthey will use Linux OS overthe next 12-24 months. ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries9PreferredEnvironments forCommerciallyDeployed LinuxOSData center and edgeserver adoption of Linuxexpected to grow thefastest. ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries10Importance ofThird-party Vendoris Evident in LinuxAdoption85% of organizationsindicated they use a Linuxdistribution provided by athird-party vendor.The 40% using community-supported distributions areup for grabs. ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries11Supporting custom servers(ARM, RISC-V, DPUs,TPUs,NVMe-controllers,FPGAs, etc.), embeddeddevices and networkequipment is critical.Organizationshave DiverseHardware SupportRequirements fortheir Linux OSes ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries12X86/Intel (66%) leads interms of processor supportrequirements reflecting itsarchitecture’s dominance inboth server and embeddedsystems.Wide range of CPUsupportrequirements reflects thewide variety of use casesand industry-specificapplications in which Linuxis deployed.Processor SupportRequirements forLinux OS ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries13Linux plays a critical role insupporting enterprisedatabase management (61%)and virtualizationenvironments (60%).•56% of organizations arealso utilizing Linux OSes forsecurity applications(e.g.,intrusion detection,encryption)which shows it istrusted for its robust securityfeatures in handlingsensitive enterprise tasks.Linux Versatility onFull Display as it isUtilized Across aWide Range ofMission-CriticalWorkloads ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries14On Average, Organization Refresh or Update (Excluding Patching) its LinuxOSes Every ~8.9 MonthsQuestion text: How often does your organization refresh or update (excluding patching) its Linux OSes? (Percent of respondents,N=475)The majority of organizations (51%) have a proactive OS lifecycle managementas theyrefresh or update theirLinux OSes regularly in less than 6 months.18%33%29%15%4%1%0%0%Every 3 monthsor soonerMore than 3months, but lessthan 6 monthsEvery 6 months,but less than 11monthsBetween 1 yearto less than 2yearsBetween 2 toless than 4 yearsBetween 4 to 5yearsMore than 5yearsNever ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries15Performance tuning andoptimization (77%) is thetop priority during pre-deployment, whichunderscores theimportance of ensuringLinux OS efficiency andhigh performance forworkloads.Pre-deploymentProcess andEvaluation Steps ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries16Timeframe for Addressing Critical Linux CVEsQuestion text: How quickly must your organization address critical Linux CVEs? (Percent of respondents, N=475)Worryingly, only 16% of organizations can addressa critical Linux CVEs within less than 24 hours, while nearly athird (30%) take more than a week to perform the same task.“Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)is a publicly listed catalog of known security threats. The catalog is sponsored by the UnitedStates Department of HomelandSecurity (DHS),and threats are divided into two categories: vulnerabilities and exposures.”16%29%25%17%9%Within less than24 hoursWithin 1 to 3daysWithin 1 weekWithin 2 weeksLess than amonth30% take morethan 1 week 3%1%0%Between 1 to 3monthsMore than 3monthsNo specifictimeframe ©TechTarget, Inc. or its subsidiaries17On Average, Organizations Using Linux on Embedded Devices have ~82Different Embedded Pro